Laser Cutter

Machine description

Our laser cutter is a CMA1080-K from Han's Yeming.

Model CMA1080-K
Laser type CO2
Laser power 100W
Processing area 1000mm x 800mm

Testing materials

We collected some thick carboard boxes in our trash bins, and we tried to cut it with the laser cutter.

The carboard began to burn. Removed it quickly.
Some other tests,...
...not deep enough (rear view of the cardboard)
Each time we tried, or it didn't pass through, or it burned! Stressing... We noticed the small white layer was kinda plastic. Maybe because of this?
Just changed material... another "proper" cardboard... worked directly like a charm!...

Testing the laser-to-object distance and power parameters

As our laser use procedure is already quite well known at the FabLab ULB, we would like to test thos values. As an exercise, we just traced very simple 2.5cm lines at 20m/s, with different power (distance 8mm) values and placing the head of the laser guide at different distances (60% power level). We wrote the values directly on the cardboard.

As you can notice, the best value (depending on your goal,... of course) for the head-material distance is at 8mm, as required in our procedures. Going to close will enlarge the line and moving the head away will enlarge. You may notice it will also "dilute" the beam power, as the beam wasn't able to cut through the carboard and even nearly didn't burn it at high distances (100 mm).

About the power, you may also notice that the kerf is slightly different depending on the used power. We don't have a clear explaination but we think it should essentially be due to the fact that the energy we bring is more important and that the material will then burn longer and progress slightly into the material.

Testing the kerf

As Victor already did this group assignment last year and that Nicolas created an OpenSCAD script taking kerf into account, we tested it quite easily. This work was already done by our FabLab team last year so we already had an idea of the actual kerf.

We placed the head at 8 mm (obtained before) for this section.

We created an OpenSCAD file with the VIG Pieces Generator, on Nicolas webpage.

Instead of cutting a piece with a target dimension and then measuring the piece, we used the "kerf" parameter of the file generator : among them, one should be the right parameter, so let's find out!

We created a square 40 with 5mm thick and kerf=0.2... This last value comes from Victor's last year assignment.
Result was pretty accurate! The join is reasonably tight.
We did several other tests with generated piece, with different "kerf parameter" and different joins. Best results were obtains with kerf=0.2 (as expected) and a simple join with chamfer. Other tests include : k = 0.3 simple joins and "with jaws, non blocking", k=0.1 k=0.4 and k=2. High (> 0.2 kerf values made the pieces difficult or impossible to press together while low values (< 0.1) made the join too loosy.